开放资源库 · 人工智能模型

RISK ASSESSMENT OF FUEL OIL BUNKERING OPERATIONS USING AN INTEGRATED HIRARC–HAZOP FRAMEWORK: A CASE STUDY AT A MARINE JETTY TERMINAL

Integrated Terminal Makassar's fuel oil bunkering operations at Jetty 1 and Jetty 2 present significant, intertwined occupational and process hazards. This study analyzed these risks by integrating Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Risk Control (HIRARC) with Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies, a novel approach for conventional fuel bunkering. HIRARC identified nine hazards across preparation, transfer, and completion stages, initially rated as low risk, subsequently reduced to low or very low via predominantly administrative controls. HAZOP analysis revealed deeper process deviations underlying these occupational hazards, including communication failures, excessive pressure and flow rates, hose integrity degradation, slippery deck conditions, and inadequate residual fuel handling during completion. The integrated HIRARC-HAZOP framework demonstrates that occupational risks directly correlate with process deviations, a connection often overlooked by single-method analyses. While existing controls are functional, three critical areas require reinforcement: formalizing pre-transfer communication checklists, establishing hose integrity documentation beyond visual inspection, and procedurally mandating the draining and disconnection sequence at operational completion. These refinements aim to enhance safety by moving beyond reliance on spontaneous compliance towards a robust, procedurally driven safety management system.

← 返回资源筛选结果
RESOURCE OVERVIEW

资源说明

Integrated Terminal Makassar's fuel oil bunkering operations at Jetty 1 and Jetty 2 present significant, intertwined occupational and process hazards. This study analyzed these risks by integrating Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Risk Control (HIRARC) with Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies, a novel approach for conventional fuel bunkering. HIRARC identified nine hazards across preparation, transfer, and completion stages, initially rated as low risk, subsequently reduced to low or very low via predominantly administrative controls. HAZOP analysis revealed deeper process deviations underlying these occupational hazards, including communication failures, excessive pressure and flow rates, hose integrity degradation, slippery deck conditions, and inadequate residual fuel handling during completion. The integrated HIRARC-HAZOP framework demonstrates that occupational risks directly correlate with process deviations, a connection often overlooked by single-method analyses. While existing controls are functional, three critical areas require reinforcement: formalizing pre-transfer communication checklists, establishing hose integrity documentation beyond visual inspection, and procedurally mandating the draining and disconnection sequence at operational completion. These refinements aim to enhance safety by moving beyond reliance on spontaneous compliance towards a robust, procedurally driven safety management system.

聚变人工智能代理模型智能控制Bunkering Safety, HIRARC, HAZOP, Integrated Risk Assessment, Occupational Hazards, Process Deviations
RESEARCH USE PROFILE

研究使用指引

适用任务状态重建、快速预测、代理计算、参数扫描与设计优化
使用准备确认输入输出、训练范围、模型版本、运行依赖和误差指标
核验重点超出训练分布或用于关键工程判断时,应由高保真模型或实验数据复核
RESOURCE FEEDBACK

资源信息需要更新?

可报告链接失效、文件异常、信息错误或版本变化,我们会核对并更新资源记录。